The Climax of New Media and Obamamania
Many have argued that Obama’s candidacy would have been less successful if it had not been for the support of candidates who were mobilized and brought together by digital and social media technologies. Then, it makes sense that a lot of buzz surrounded the role of new and social media when covering President Barack Obama’s inauguration.
Some posts I recommend that I found online looking at the issue:
- A PBS MediaShift column on innovation across traditional and non-traditional media organizations
- The Center for Future Civic Media at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology suggests where people can submit content and get information about the event
- A view on the issue from across the pond at the BBC
The Washington Post’s Interactive Map
(Get me to the analysis already!)
But one of the best features I saw, which in the interest of full disclosure I should say I found via MediaShift, was this interactive map from the Washington Post:.

A Detailed Analysis
| What I liked about this site |
|---|
The map solidly integrates video, photos and articles, giving the user a lot of freedom in choosing how to interact with the site.
|
| What this site could have done better |
|
| Other ways the inauguration could have been covered |
|
A Comparison with Other Media
| Washington Post | twitter.com | Chicago Tribune |
|---|---|---|
| content from professional organization, but user has great deal of flexibility interacting with it | runs solely on user contribution | content only from professionals, not a lot of flexibility in interactivity |
| uses photo, audio, video and minimal text | only text, with external links to a variety of multimedia | mostly text, some photo galleries, types of content not well integrated |
| uses map to place user in DC | no map here | no map here |
| updates have stopped | still being updated | no more updates |
Recent Comments — Join the Discussion!