<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual confections are more than mere presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelleminkoff.com/2010/02/15/striving-toward-visual-storytelling-not-just-presentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelleminkoff.com/2010/02/15/striving-toward-visual-storytelling-not-just-presentation/</link>
	<description>=SUM (Passion + journalism + data + technology)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://michelleminkoff.com/2010/02/15/striving-toward-visual-storytelling-not-just-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleminkoff.com/?p=627#comment-72</guid>
		<description>To distinguish between visual confections and journalistic presentations of data, I fall back on the same standard that I use for distinguishing between mere information and valuable journalism: Valuable journalism informs the decisions of its audience members. It&#039;s not just about a &quot;storytelling&quot; (an unfortunate word choice I&#039;ve come to accept I&#039;ll never get journalists to stop using in reference to the task of putting available information in any format that is both relevant and digestible for a particular target audience). In military intelligence terms, it&#039;s about showing how the data are actionable (and therefore worth publishing, i.e. &quot;valuable&quot;).

As I tell student journalists I speak with, it isn&#039;t news if it doesn&#039;t answer all three of &quot;What?&quot;, &quot;So what?&quot;, and &quot;Now what?&quot; Most charts in the news do OK answering the first one; most charts in the news also fail miserably answering the second and third.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To distinguish between visual confections and journalistic presentations of data, I fall back on the same standard that I use for distinguishing between mere information and valuable journalism: Valuable journalism informs the decisions of its audience members. It&#8217;s not just about a &#8220;storytelling&#8221; (an unfortunate word choice I&#8217;ve come to accept I&#8217;ll never get journalists to stop using in reference to the task of putting available information in any format that is both relevant and digestible for a particular target audience). In military intelligence terms, it&#8217;s about showing how the data are actionable (and therefore worth publishing, i.e. &#8220;valuable&#8221;).</p>
<p>As I tell student journalists I speak with, it isn&#8217;t news if it doesn&#8217;t answer all three of &#8220;What?&#8221;, &#8220;So what?&#8221;, and &#8220;Now what?&#8221; Most charts in the news do OK answering the first one; most charts in the news also fail miserably answering the second and third.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

